<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Picture Frame &#38; Digital Photo Frame Reviews &#187; Frame Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/category/brands/frame-media/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com</link>
	<description>Digital picture frame and photo frame reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 02:16:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Frame Media Fires Back at Ceiva, &#8220;Your Patent Isn&#8217;t Valid Anyway&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/06/frame-media-fires-back-at-cevia-your-patent-isnt-valid-anyway</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/06/frame-media-fires-back-at-cevia-your-patent-isnt-valid-anyway#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ceiva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frame Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cevia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frame Media has issued a press release indicating they plan in fighting Cevia's claim that Frame Media is infinging on their patent that essentially covers serving images to a digital picture frame over a network of some kind. The patent was issued in 1999 and does appear to be a bit broad by today's standards.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/frame-media-logo.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-54" title="frame-media-logo" src="http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/frame-media-logo.jpg" alt="Frame Media" width="260" height="54" /></a></p>
<p>Frame Media has issued a press release indicating they plan in fighting <a href="http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/ceiva-sues-over-digital-frame-patent" target="_blank">Ceiva&#8217;s claim</a> that Frame Media is infinging on their patent that essentially covers serving images to a digital picture frame over a network of some kind. The patent was issued in 1999 and does appear to be a bit broad by today&#8217;s standards.</p>
<p>Frame Media&#8217;s CEO Alan Phillips said, “The technology in our FrameChannel service does not infringe on the patent owned by Ceiva Logic. We will defend our service which allows frame owners to program a unique stream of images that is updated dynamically, combining their own photos with dynamic content provided by FrameChannel and its partners.”</p>
<p>Phillips went on to say, “FrameMedia was served a few days ago. We are only at a very early stage of discovery. However, our initial findings suggest not only that Frame Media does not infringe Ceiva Logic’s patent, but that Ceiva Logic’s patent may be invalid. We look forward to presenting our case in U.S. District Court.”</p>
<p>It will likely take many months if not years to see how this plays out. Frame Media is venture-backed, they recently added $3 million to their war chest. Although investors won&#8217;t be happy about defending against intellectual property claims with that money, they should be able to see it though to determine the validity of Ceiva&#8217;s patent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/06/frame-media-fires-back-at-cevia-your-patent-isnt-valid-anyway/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

