<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: HP DreamScreen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/09/review-hp-dreamscreen/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/09/review-hp-dreamscreen</link>
	<description>Digital picture frame and photo frame reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:32:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Unimpressed</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/09/review-hp-dreamscreen/comment-page-1#comment-4260</link>
		<dc:creator>Unimpressed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=1320#comment-4260</guid>
		<description>$250 for a measly 800 x 480 resolution? I don&#039;t care how fancy the interface is - at a ratio like that, companies like HP (and numerous others) will continue to prolong the slow adoption of wireless frames. 

Given how exorbitantly wireless frames have been priced, it&#039;s conceivable that netbooks will become cheaper than them in the near future; and, being more versatile, will lure away a significant chunk of prospective buyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$250 for a measly 800 x 480 resolution? I don&#8217;t care how fancy the interface is &#8211; at a ratio like that, companies like HP (and numerous others) will continue to prolong the slow adoption of wireless frames. </p>
<p>Given how exorbitantly wireless frames have been priced, it&#8217;s conceivable that netbooks will become cheaper than them in the near future; and, being more versatile, will lure away a significant chunk of prospective buyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg in WI</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/09/review-hp-dreamscreen/comment-page-1#comment-4240</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg in WI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=1320#comment-4240</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m one of those guys, probably like you Brian, that really likes gadgets. For me tinkering with them is part of their fun. But I just can help but wonder that if something like this will be seen as &quot;overkill&quot; or too complex for the average person. When you consider what a laptop can do, a cell phone can do, will the typical consumer want to fiddle with, set up and manage another gadget this complex? Just wondering out loud.

Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of those guys, probably like you Brian, that really likes gadgets. For me tinkering with them is part of their fun. But I just can help but wonder that if something like this will be seen as &#8220;overkill&#8221; or too complex for the average person. When you consider what a laptop can do, a cell phone can do, will the typical consumer want to fiddle with, set up and manage another gadget this complex? Just wondering out loud.</p>
<p>Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/09/review-hp-dreamscreen/comment-page-1#comment-4232</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=1320#comment-4232</guid>
		<description>1280 - sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1280 &#8211; sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/09/review-hp-dreamscreen/comment-page-1#comment-4221</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=1320#comment-4221</guid>
		<description>Is the resolution on the 13&quot; 1280x800 or 1024x800.  Both are mentioned in the review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the resolution on the 13&#8243; 1280&#215;800 or 1024&#215;800.  Both are mentioned in the review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Eyez</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/09/review-hp-dreamscreen/comment-page-1#comment-4210</link>
		<dc:creator>The Eyez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 00:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=1320#comment-4210</guid>
		<description>This is really nice but the calendar let me down. I would have bought this if the calendar is a full feature (add/delete event).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really nice but the calendar let me down. I would have bought this if the calendar is a full feature (add/delete event).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlton Bale</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/09/review-hp-dreamscreen/comment-page-1#comment-4195</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlton Bale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=1320#comment-4195</guid>
		<description>Please help me figure out if the HP DreamScreens can do the following. I&#039;m looking for a photo frame that automatically turns on and starts displaying what ever pictures are stored on my computer.

I know the DreamScreen is capable of displaying (streaming) pictures from any computer with Windows Media Player 11, but what I don&#039;t know is if it will enter this mode automatically. 

I don&#039;t want a photo frame that requires I go through a menu every time to display pictures on my computer. I want one that will automatically boot and start randomly streaming/displaying all of my pictures, no user interaction required.  Will the new DreamScreens do this?

Thanks the great initial review and any other details you can offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please help me figure out if the HP DreamScreens can do the following. I&#8217;m looking for a photo frame that automatically turns on and starts displaying what ever pictures are stored on my computer.</p>
<p>I know the DreamScreen is capable of displaying (streaming) pictures from any computer with Windows Media Player 11, but what I don&#8217;t know is if it will enter this mode automatically. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want a photo frame that requires I go through a menu every time to display pictures on my computer. I want one that will automatically boot and start randomly streaming/displaying all of my pictures, no user interaction required.  Will the new DreamScreens do this?</p>
<p>Thanks the great initial review and any other details you can offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/09/review-hp-dreamscreen/comment-page-1#comment-4180</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=1320#comment-4180</guid>
		<description>I wish it supported RSS feeds.. maybe it will in the future.
The article doesn&#039;t say anything about power-savings modes or motion sensor but I hope it has something that turns it off during the days..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish it supported RSS feeds.. maybe it will in the future.<br />
The article doesn&#8217;t say anything about power-savings modes or motion sensor but I hope it has something that turns it off during the days..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/09/review-hp-dreamscreen/comment-page-1#comment-4177</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=1320#comment-4177</guid>
		<description>too much &quot;stuff&quot; for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too much &#8220;stuff&#8221; for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
