<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JOBO Nano 7 Announced &#8211; .35&#8243; Thick 7&#8243; Digital Frame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/05/jobo-nano-7-announced-35-thick-7-digital-frame/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/05/jobo-nano-7-announced-35-thick-7-digital-frame</link>
	<description>Digital picture frame and photo frame reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigiFrame Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/05/jobo-nano-7-announced-35-thick-7-digital-frame/comment-page-1#comment-3211</link>
		<dc:creator>DigiFrame Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=1180#comment-3211</guid>
		<description>Here we go again, what looks like an amazing product, ruined by the 16:10 (16:9) aspect ratio. Do these companies even read all the review sites that say the majority of people (FOR NOW!!) want 4:3!!! And I hope the little stand thingy can be removed and the whole unit is then wall mountable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again, what looks like an amazing product, ruined by the 16:10 (16:9) aspect ratio. Do these companies even read all the review sites that say the majority of people (FOR NOW!!) want 4:3!!! And I hope the little stand thingy can be removed and the whole unit is then wall mountable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

