<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Impact eStarling7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/01/review-impact-estarling7/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/01/review-impact-estarling7</link>
	<description>Digital picture frame and photo frame reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:32:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nina</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/01/review-impact-estarling7/comment-page-1#comment-1808</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=958#comment-1808</guid>
		<description>They have the impact 8 which is everything plus great resolution. Its 800x600, although its $169. Thanks best review of it I&#039;ve read yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have the impact 8 which is everything plus great resolution. Its 800&#215;600, although its $169. Thanks best review of it I&#8217;ve read yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2009/01/review-impact-estarling7/comment-page-1#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=958#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>The price is right, but the low resolution on these frames would probably be a deal- breaker for me.  I saw some HD wireless didital frames from CEIVA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The price is right, but the low resolution on these frames would probably be a deal- breaker for me.  I saw some HD wireless didital frames from CEIVA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
