<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Kodak EasyShare W820 Digital Picture Frame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/11/review-kodak-easyshare-w820-digital-picture-frame/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/11/review-kodak-easyshare-w820-digital-picture-frame</link>
	<description>Digital picture frame and photo frame reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:32:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/11/review-kodak-easyshare-w820-digital-picture-frame/comment-page-1#comment-2920</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=702#comment-2920</guid>
		<description>Addendum:

You can modify the shortcuts on the home screen, so if you create a new RSS feed (for example), it can be available with a single touch.  Very nice.

Still testing the number of photos you can get in through different methods.  For those interested, the following Flickr discussions are a good starting point.  

http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/87885/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addendum:</p>
<p>You can modify the shortcuts on the home screen, so if you create a new RSS feed (for example), it can be available with a single touch.  Very nice.</p>
<p>Still testing the number of photos you can get in through different methods.  For those interested, the following Flickr discussions are a good starting point.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/87885/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/87885/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/11/review-kodak-easyshare-w820-digital-picture-frame/comment-page-1#comment-2919</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 22:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=702#comment-2919</guid>
		<description>Just bought one of these May 11, 2009.  Still fiddling with it, but some corrections/updates to comments above.

First, I had a devil of a time getting it online with a Airport Extreme router set to WEP encryption.  It detected the router as using (stronger) WPA2 encryption.  I turned off security, and it connected fine.  I then changed the router to WPA2, and it also connected fine.

You need the firmware update (and hence the internet connection) to see some of the Flickr options.  Links to updated docs for Flickr use are on the Kodak support site.

Finally, on Mac you can access the frame from your web browser, rather than using the Kodak software.  Get the address from the frame (Settings &gt; About) and just type that into your browser.  I expect you could also do this on PC.  Everything you need there to configure the Flickr, RSS etc.  I set my W820 up on a MacBook Pro, and it&#039;s streaming pics from Flickr now.

Agree RSS syntax acceptance is hit or miss.  You can get your RSS feed from Flickr, for example, from the bottom of the page (for a set, etc).  An example of a working RSS syntax is:

http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photos_public.gne?id=12345678@N00&amp;lang=en-us&amp;format=rss_200

(note removed my &quot;id&quot; and put in 12345678 instead)

If you just want to set up a feed based on a tag, you can do that through a wizard, rather than cut&#039;n&#039;pasting URLs.

There are two ways to get to Flickr content.  There is a Flickr button on the main screen.  Select that and you will get your Photostream and those of your contacts/Friends&amp;family (not sure the exact criteria) intermixed.  If you just want, say, a specific set or just your own photostream, you tap the screen again, and select &quot;More Flickr&quot; and there are lots of intuitive options there.  No complaints, except that you end up doing 4-5 taps to get what you want (fine for me, not for a gift).

The other option is the RSS feeds I mentioned above.  To do those, set them up in the software/web browser.  Then instead of the Flickr button, on the home screen you tap the Web Media button, then RSS Feeds, then select your feed.  So you save a couple steps this way.

Not sure about the whole &quot;immediately showing up&quot; thing.  My impression is that this is not true of RSS feeds, but perhaps it works with the default Flickr option.  

My recommendation would be, if this is for a gift, to set up a Flickr account (free) for the recipient, and then make yourself a friend/contact.  (All) your (public?) content will then flow automatically to the frame, and you won&#039;t have to worry about other people&#039;s (potentially inappropriate) photos showing up on grandma&#039;s wall.

Also agree the widescreen, while looking really nice, make the occasional picture awkward.  Most of the time I don&#039;t notice.  May depend on the kind of pictures you put in it.

Overall, more finicky than I&#039;d like, but very nice once you get it working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just bought one of these May 11, 2009.  Still fiddling with it, but some corrections/updates to comments above.</p>
<p>First, I had a devil of a time getting it online with a Airport Extreme router set to WEP encryption.  It detected the router as using (stronger) WPA2 encryption.  I turned off security, and it connected fine.  I then changed the router to WPA2, and it also connected fine.</p>
<p>You need the firmware update (and hence the internet connection) to see some of the Flickr options.  Links to updated docs for Flickr use are on the Kodak support site.</p>
<p>Finally, on Mac you can access the frame from your web browser, rather than using the Kodak software.  Get the address from the frame (Settings &gt; About) and just type that into your browser.  I expect you could also do this on PC.  Everything you need there to configure the Flickr, RSS etc.  I set my W820 up on a MacBook Pro, and it&#8217;s streaming pics from Flickr now.</p>
<p>Agree RSS syntax acceptance is hit or miss.  You can get your RSS feed from Flickr, for example, from the bottom of the page (for a set, etc).  An example of a working RSS syntax is:</p>
<p><a href="http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photos_public.gne?id=12345678@N00&amp;lang=en-us&amp;format=rss_200" rel="nofollow">http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photos_public.gne?id=12345678@N00&amp;lang=en-us&amp;format=rss_200</a></p>
<p>(note removed my &#8220;id&#8221; and put in 12345678 instead)</p>
<p>If you just want to set up a feed based on a tag, you can do that through a wizard, rather than cut&#8217;n'pasting URLs.</p>
<p>There are two ways to get to Flickr content.  There is a Flickr button on the main screen.  Select that and you will get your Photostream and those of your contacts/Friends&amp;family (not sure the exact criteria) intermixed.  If you just want, say, a specific set or just your own photostream, you tap the screen again, and select &#8220;More Flickr&#8221; and there are lots of intuitive options there.  No complaints, except that you end up doing 4-5 taps to get what you want (fine for me, not for a gift).</p>
<p>The other option is the RSS feeds I mentioned above.  To do those, set them up in the software/web browser.  Then instead of the Flickr button, on the home screen you tap the Web Media button, then RSS Feeds, then select your feed.  So you save a couple steps this way.</p>
<p>Not sure about the whole &#8220;immediately showing up&#8221; thing.  My impression is that this is not true of RSS feeds, but perhaps it works with the default Flickr option.  </p>
<p>My recommendation would be, if this is for a gift, to set up a Flickr account (free) for the recipient, and then make yourself a friend/contact.  (All) your (public?) content will then flow automatically to the frame, and you won&#8217;t have to worry about other people&#8217;s (potentially inappropriate) photos showing up on grandma&#8217;s wall.</p>
<p>Also agree the widescreen, while looking really nice, make the occasional picture awkward.  Most of the time I don&#8217;t notice.  May depend on the kind of pictures you put in it.</p>
<p>Overall, more finicky than I&#8217;d like, but very nice once you get it working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac_user</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/11/review-kodak-easyshare-w820-digital-picture-frame/comment-page-1#comment-1622</link>
		<dc:creator>mac_user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=702#comment-1622</guid>
		<description>There is no mac software at the moment that works with this frame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no mac software at the moment that works with this frame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/11/review-kodak-easyshare-w820-digital-picture-frame/comment-page-1#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=702#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>I have also purchased this...but will most likely return it as well. What the reviewer spins as a &quot;movie-friendly 16:9 aspect ratio&quot; is actually...ridiculous. This is a PICTURE frame... if it plays the occasional movie, great... but there is no big push I know of in the digital photography industry to 16:9 aspect ratio for PHOTOS. Now for the main reason you have purchased this frame, you must compromise the display of your 10,000 or so 4:3 ratio family photos for the .00001% chance you will be playing an HD Mpeg file... That is not a feature, or a mere drawback... it is a mistake and a dealbreaker. I already have an HD television. Trust me, if you have a large computerized photo collection like myself, you will not like how much gets cut off when this frame displays them, and the Fit To Frame option is not a suitable answer, as the large black bars on the side of each picture look... terrible. And just imagine how strange portrait-oriented pictures look this way!  The 2009 Techie Big Whoops Award goes to Kodak. Too bad...because there is a lot to like about other aspects of this frame, mainly the display quality, which is very nice. Shame. Let&#039;s hope this is not the &quot;wave&quot; of the future in digital photo frame technology...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also purchased this&#8230;but will most likely return it as well. What the reviewer spins as a &#8220;movie-friendly 16:9 aspect ratio&#8221; is actually&#8230;ridiculous. This is a PICTURE frame&#8230; if it plays the occasional movie, great&#8230; but there is no big push I know of in the digital photography industry to 16:9 aspect ratio for PHOTOS. Now for the main reason you have purchased this frame, you must compromise the display of your 10,000 or so 4:3 ratio family photos for the .00001% chance you will be playing an HD Mpeg file&#8230; That is not a feature, or a mere drawback&#8230; it is a mistake and a dealbreaker. I already have an HD television. Trust me, if you have a large computerized photo collection like myself, you will not like how much gets cut off when this frame displays them, and the Fit To Frame option is not a suitable answer, as the large black bars on the side of each picture look&#8230; terrible. And just imagine how strange portrait-oriented pictures look this way!  The 2009 Techie Big Whoops Award goes to Kodak. Too bad&#8230;because there is a lot to like about other aspects of this frame, mainly the display quality, which is very nice. Shame. Let&#8217;s hope this is not the &#8220;wave&#8221; of the future in digital photo frame technology&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/11/review-kodak-easyshare-w820-digital-picture-frame/comment-page-1#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=702#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>I have also purchased this...but will most likely return it as well. What the reviewer spins as a &quot;movie-friendly 16:9 aspect ratio&quot; is actually...ridiculous. This is a PICTURE frame... if it plays the occasional movie, great... but there is no big push I know of in the digital photography industry to 16:9 aspect ratio for PHOTOS. Now for the main reason you have purchased this frame, you must compromise the display of your 10,000 or so 4:3 ratio family photos for the .00001% chance you will be playing an HD Mpeg file... That is not a feature, or a mere drawback... it is a mistake and a dealbreaker. The 2009 Techie Big Whoops Award goes to Kodak. Shame too...because there is a lot to like about other aspects of this frame, mainly the display quality, which is very nice. Shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also purchased this&#8230;but will most likely return it as well. What the reviewer spins as a &#8220;movie-friendly 16:9 aspect ratio&#8221; is actually&#8230;ridiculous. This is a PICTURE frame&#8230; if it plays the occasional movie, great&#8230; but there is no big push I know of in the digital photography industry to 16:9 aspect ratio for PHOTOS. Now for the main reason you have purchased this frame, you must compromise the display of your 10,000 or so 4:3 ratio family photos for the .00001% chance you will be playing an HD Mpeg file&#8230; That is not a feature, or a mere drawback&#8230; it is a mistake and a dealbreaker. The 2009 Techie Big Whoops Award goes to Kodak. Shame too&#8230;because there is a lot to like about other aspects of this frame, mainly the display quality, which is very nice. Shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mec</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/11/review-kodak-easyshare-w820-digital-picture-frame/comment-page-1#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>Mec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=702#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>This photo frame chokes and crashes on me all the time -- I&#039;ll be returning it for refund. I assume it cannot handle a large number of photos, because if I try to load my photo collection -- either from the network, or straight off an 8 gig SDHC card -- it slows to a crawl, never manages to load any photos, and ultimately crashes. No problem with a couple of dozen photos on it&#039;s internal memory, but if you collection includes 1000 photos or more, this frame becomes useless.

The service&#039;s cool RSS feeds -- that show news and weather, etc. -- push advertising to your frame, rendering them unbearable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This photo frame chokes and crashes on me all the time &#8212; I&#8217;ll be returning it for refund. I assume it cannot handle a large number of photos, because if I try to load my photo collection &#8212; either from the network, or straight off an 8 gig SDHC card &#8212; it slows to a crawl, never manages to load any photos, and ultimately crashes. No problem with a couple of dozen photos on it&#8217;s internal memory, but if you collection includes 1000 photos or more, this frame becomes useless.</p>
<p>The service&#8217;s cool RSS feeds &#8212; that show news and weather, etc. &#8212; push advertising to your frame, rendering them unbearable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serge</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/11/review-kodak-easyshare-w820-digital-picture-frame/comment-page-1#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>Serge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 06:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=702#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>Of course, this is not the first time I run across sub-standard software with a Kodak logo!  Why insist on calling something EASY when it doesn&#039;t work as expected, and is not at all intuitive!

I got a xmas gift called Kodak EasyShare W820.  The features looks great, the picture quality seems very acceptable, even if the screen size is a bit small for the price paid...

We got it on the WiFi Internet very easy, upgraded the firmware. We copied a few photos on the device with memory cards.  Great!

But... why Am I stuck with weather forecast for OTTAWA -- where I have friends, but NOT where I reside! -- and non-Canadian news and sports feeds?

None of the menus give hint where you are suppose to tell it where you live and what type of feeds you&#039;d like to get...  

Now on the PC end : I installed the EasyShare software twice cause it failed the first time.  Then checked for updates after it failed to work and then now 2hr later there is an update available!  But still 9 times out of 10 I can&#039;t even bring up the Device&#039;s Config menu when doing it over WiFi (and it doesn&#039;t seem like you can do that at all if you plan to use the USB connection)!

So far, I had to manually go and setup an account for a Kodak Gallery service... I _think_ it&#039;s supposed to be done for me, but it failed...

So I uploaded some sample photos, some of which appear of be of lesser quality than the ones uploade directly to the device.  A bit odd..

Now IT SEEMS I need yet ANOTHER registration for something called a Frame Channel service...  and this MIGHT be where I tell the device I am not planning to move to Ottawa so its forecast is usefull for me!

Easy huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, this is not the first time I run across sub-standard software with a Kodak logo!  Why insist on calling something EASY when it doesn&#8217;t work as expected, and is not at all intuitive!</p>
<p>I got a xmas gift called Kodak EasyShare W820.  The features looks great, the picture quality seems very acceptable, even if the screen size is a bit small for the price paid&#8230;</p>
<p>We got it on the WiFi Internet very easy, upgraded the firmware. We copied a few photos on the device with memory cards.  Great!</p>
<p>But&#8230; why Am I stuck with weather forecast for OTTAWA &#8212; where I have friends, but NOT where I reside! &#8212; and non-Canadian news and sports feeds?</p>
<p>None of the menus give hint where you are suppose to tell it where you live and what type of feeds you&#8217;d like to get&#8230;  </p>
<p>Now on the PC end : I installed the EasyShare software twice cause it failed the first time.  Then checked for updates after it failed to work and then now 2hr later there is an update available!  But still 9 times out of 10 I can&#8217;t even bring up the Device&#8217;s Config menu when doing it over WiFi (and it doesn&#8217;t seem like you can do that at all if you plan to use the USB connection)!</p>
<p>So far, I had to manually go and setup an account for a Kodak Gallery service&#8230; I _think_ it&#8217;s supposed to be done for me, but it failed&#8230;</p>
<p>So I uploaded some sample photos, some of which appear of be of lesser quality than the ones uploade directly to the device.  A bit odd..</p>
<p>Now IT SEEMS I need yet ANOTHER registration for something called a Frame Channel service&#8230;  and this MIGHT be where I tell the device I am not planning to move to Ottawa so its forecast is usefull for me!</p>
<p>Easy huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/11/review-kodak-easyshare-w820-digital-picture-frame/comment-page-1#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=702#comment-1373</guid>
		<description>Make sure the feeds are sending the full resolution photos. I don&#039;t personally use those services, but it may be that they&#039;re scaling down either on the upload or in their feeds to save on bandwidth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make sure the feeds are sending the full resolution photos. I don&#8217;t personally use those services, but it may be that they&#8217;re scaling down either on the upload or in their feeds to save on bandwidth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/11/review-kodak-easyshare-w820-digital-picture-frame/comment-page-1#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=702#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>For some reason, the pictures downloaded from flickr or the Kodak gallery appear much less sharp than the same pictures read from Flash cards... A real drag as far I am concerned and possibly a strong enough reason to return this pricey frame to the store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason, the pictures downloaded from flickr or the Kodak gallery appear much less sharp than the same pictures read from Flash cards&#8230; A real drag as far I am concerned and possibly a strong enough reason to return this pricey frame to the store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
