<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet-Enabled Digital Picture Frames Will Ultimately Rule the Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/08/connected-digital-picture-frames-will-ultimately-rule-the-market/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/08/connected-digital-picture-frames-will-ultimately-rule-the-market</link>
	<description>Digital picture frame and photo frame reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:32:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DigiFrame Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/08/connected-digital-picture-frames-will-ultimately-rule-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-3210</link>
		<dc:creator>DigiFrame Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=277#comment-3210</guid>
		<description>When you say it &quot;mauls the feed&quot; does this mean it just doesn&#039;t come out looking the way it should? And what are some of the other reasons FrameChannel is not well liked. I realize I am responding almost 10 months after this was posted. Wonder whether they have improved on some of this now. Also, you said a lot of their services are free, how long will this last?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you say it &#8220;mauls the feed&#8221; does this mean it just doesn&#8217;t come out looking the way it should? And what are some of the other reasons FrameChannel is not well liked. I realize I am responding almost 10 months after this was posted. Wonder whether they have improved on some of this now. Also, you said a lot of their services are free, how long will this last?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/08/connected-digital-picture-frames-will-ultimately-rule-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=277#comment-695</guid>
		<description>Trevor - there are a few that do this, but most through the Frame Channel service which mauls the feeds in most cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trevor &#8211; there are a few that do this, but most through the Frame Channel service which mauls the feeds in most cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/2008/08/connected-digital-picture-frames-will-ultimately-rule-the-market/comment-page-1#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalpictureframereview.com/?p=277#comment-694</guid>
		<description>How about mentioning frames with RSS feed support.  I&#039;d much rather pull from my Gallery feed rather then another silly service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about mentioning frames with RSS feed support.  I&#8217;d much rather pull from my Gallery feed rather then another silly service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
